GHOLAMALI MOGHADDAM
Abstract
Logic is considered a Criterion of thought correction, and in order to be a criterion, it must have sufficient clarity to correct thought. Naming and defining are imaginary principles of science and need this clarity more than other topics. The naming of modal proposition in traditional logic is less ...
Read More
Logic is considered a Criterion of thought correction, and in order to be a criterion, it must have sufficient clarity to correct thought. Naming and defining are imaginary principles of science and need this clarity more than other topics. The naming of modal proposition in traditional logic is less committed to this principle and has been exaggerated and ambiguous. Naturally, modal proposition in traditional logic is met with reluctance by logic students. The use of strange words and vague naming methods in the position of education, leads to more reluctance in this area. This method will reduce the logic learner's desire to continue the discussion in traditional modal and will lead to its seclusion in traditional logic. So, the research question is: what is the critique of the traditional modal Logic method in naming modal proposition? And how can we change this method to make it easier to teach logic? In this article - analytically - we have criticized the naming method of modal proposition in traditional modal Logic. And we have shown how we can use proper names in naming modal propositions. This way, reduced the difficulty of naming modal propositions in traditional modal Logic.
