Volume 14 (2023)
Volume 13 (2022)
Volume 12 (2021)
Volume 11 (2020)
Volume 10 (2019)
Volume 9 (2018)
Volume 8 (2017)
Volume 7 (2016)
Volume 6 (2015)
Volume 5 (2014)
Volume 4 (2013)
Volume 3 (2012)
Volume 1 (2010)
A Critical Pondering in Using Second-order Quantifier in Analyzing Cogent Conditional
Volume 2, Issue 1 , March 2011, Pages 1-23

Abstract
  The current paper is an attempt to analyze the the Avicennian Cogent conditional quantifier based on Second-order Logic. Contemporary researchers have provided various formalizations of Avicennian conditionals to the Modern Logic language. A major difference between these formalizations is the analysis ...  Read More

Supervaluationism, Vagueness and the Sorites Paradox

Davood Hosseini

Volume 2, Issue 1 , March 2011, Pages 25-48

Abstract
  In this paper I expose and evaluate supervaluationist theory of vagueness. Specially, I concentrate on the standard version of it. This criticism is twofold: first, this theory cannot model all intuitions about vague predicates and though it select a proper subset of these intuitions, its preference ...  Read More

An Analysis of The Liar Paradox Withing The Framework of The Theory of Structured Propositions

Alireza Dastafshan

Volume 2, Issue 1 , March 2011, Pages 49-61

Abstract
  The Liar is a self-referential sentence which says that it is false. In this article, we will first show that the main two traditional and well-known solutions of this paradox cannot survive a serious scrutiny. Then, we will use two important premises to introduce a new solution for the problem. The ...  Read More

Priest on Impossible Worlds and Intentional Contexts

Behnam Zolqadr; Fereshteh Nabati

Volume 2, Issue 1 , March 2011, Pages 63-84

Abstract
  Hintikkain analysis of the semantics of epistemic logic, according to respond to the problem of logical omniscience, used Impossible Worlds. It was the first appearance of the term Impossible World. Graham Priest also appeals to Impossible Worlds in analysis of intentional contexts. After an exposition ...  Read More

Porphyry's Aristotelian Definitions for Genus and Species A Comparison Between Ibn Sina and Barthes' Understanding

Mahdi Azimi

Volume 2, Issue 1 , March 2011, Pages 85-102

Abstract
  In his Isagoge, Porphyry provides circular definitions for genus and species; and to justify this point, following Aristotle, he attaches emphasis to correlation between the two concepts and that the definitions for two correlative concepts should be circular. Ibn Sina, however, interprets Aristotelian ...  Read More

Modern Logical Analysis of the Threefold Generalities of Principles of Jurisprudence

Asadollah Fallahi

Volume 2, Issue 1 , March 2011, Pages 103-126

Abstract
  Faqihs and Osulians have dealt with some kinds of universality which are 1. “distributive”, “separative” or “inclusive universality”, 2. “aggregative”, “collective” or “cumulative universality”, and 3. “alternative universality”. ...  Read More

What the Tortoise Said to Achilles?

Human Mohammad Ghorbanian

Volume 2, Issue 1 , March 2011, Pages 127-148

Abstract
  Lewis Carroll in “What the Tortoise Said to Achilles?” questioning one the most important basis of logic and by narrating a fanciful dialog asks why we should move from premises to the conclusion. Is logic itself enough to justify the use of logic or we need something beyond logic to do that. ...  Read More