Document Type : Translation & Critic

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University (Corresponding author),

2 Ph.D Student in Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University

3  Associate Professor of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University

4  Associate Professor of Department of Linguistic, Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

Many philosophers claim that semantic content of language is normative, which means that meaning of a term prescribes the pattern of use or determines which pattern of use can be described as ‘correct’. The most important arguments for normativity, made by Kripke, Boghossian and others, are based on the concepts of ‘regularities’, ‘correct uses’  and ‘possibility of semantic mistakes’. But some philosophers have scrutinized the slogan ‘meaning is normative’ and have found some flaws in pro arguments. There are good reasons to consider the normativity of meaning as a side effect of ‘being public ’; that is, meaning, as itself, is neutral to correct or incorrect uses, but the moral or social laws of society impose several norms on language.

Keywords

 
Bilgrami, Akeel )1993(. ‘Norms and Meaning’, In Ralph Stoecker (ed.), Reflecting Dividson, Berlin: De Gruyter.
Boghossian, Paul A. (1989). ‘The Rule-Following Considerations’, Mind, Vol. 98.
Gibbard, Allan (1994). ‘Meaning and Normativity’, Philosophical Issues, Vol. 5.
Glock, Hans-Johann (2005). ‘The Normativity of Meaning Made Simple’, In Nimtz and Beckermann (eds.).
Glüer, Kathrin and P. Pagin (1999). ‘Rules of Meaning and Practical Reasoning’, Synthese, Vol. 117.
Glüer, Kathrin and Wikforss, Åsa M. (2008). ‘Against Normativity Again, Reply toWhiting’, In The Aim of Belief, T. Chan (ed.), Oxford: OUP.
Hattiangadi, Anandi (2006). ‘Is Meaning Normative?’, Mind & Language, Vol. 21.
Itkonen, Esa (2008). ‘The Central Role of Normativity in Language’, In Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen (eds.), The Shared Mind, Vol. 12 of Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kripke, Saul A. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, An Elementary Exposition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lewis, David K. (2002). Convention, A Philosophical Study, Oxford: Blackwell.
Millar, Alan (2002). ‘The Normativity of Meaning’, In Anthony O’Hear (ed.), Logic, Thought, and Language, Vol. 51 of Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Millar, Alan (2004). Understanding People, Normativity and Rationalizing Explanation, Oxford and New York: Clarendon.
Millikan, Ruth G. (2006). Varieties of Meaning, The 2002 Jean Nicod lectures, London: Bradford Books.
Schulte, Peter (2009). ‘Moral and Rational ‘Oughts’, The Distinction Between ‘Demanding’ and ‘Recommending’ Normativity’, In Dora Achourioti, Edgar Andrade, and Marc Staudacher (eds.), Proceedings for the Graduate Philosophy Conference Onnormativity, No. X-2009-02 in ILLC Publications, Amsterdam.
Searle, John R. (1969). Speech Acts, An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whiting, Daniel (2009). ‘Is Meaning Fraught With’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 90.
Wikforss, Åsa M. (2001). ‘Semantic Normativity’, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 102.
Winch, Peter (1963). The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees (eds.), Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell.