Volume 14 (2023)
Volume 13 (2022)
Volume 12 (2021)
Volume 11 (2020)
Volume 10 (2019)
Volume 9 (2018)
Volume 8 (2017)
Volume 7 (2016)
Volume 6 (2015)
Volume 5 (2014)
Volume 3 (2012)
Volume 2 (2011)
Volume 1 (2010)
A Critique of the Paper "the Paradox of Informing from Absolute Unknown: Analyzing the Concept of ‘Information" ‘.

Mahdi Assadi

Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 1-43

Abstract
  The main purpose of this essay is to review and criticize the paper published earlier in this journal, Logical Study, titled ‘the Paradox of the informing from Absolute Unknown: Analyzing the Concept of information’ written by Sharifzadeh and Hodjati. In spite of having some useful points, ...  Read More

Normativity of Meaning

Seied Mohammad Ali Hodjati; Homan Mohammad Ghorbanian; Lotfollah Nabavi; Arsalan Golfam

Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 44-64

Abstract
  Many philosophers claim that semantic content of language is normative, which means that meaning of a term prescribes the pattern of use or determines which pattern of use can be described as ‘correct’. The most important arguments for normativity, made by Kripke, Boghossian and others, are ...  Read More

The Pseudo-Conceptuality of Inherently Impossible Affairs

Behzad Hamidieh

Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 65-88

Abstract
  Even though, in Aristotelian and Islamic logic and philosophy, inherently impossible affairs don’t actualize in the world and can’t be actualized, they are considered meaningful, and thus their characteristics and their philosophical judgments have been discussed by Islamic philosophers. ...  Read More

Anselm’s Ontological Argument and the Self-Comparison Problem

Hamed Ghadiri; Davood Hosseini

Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 89-108

Abstract
  Anselm’s ontological argument is the most famous one which has been controversial since its appearance. One crucial part of the argument is “if [that than which nothing greater cannot be conceived] exists solely in the mind even, it can be thought to exist in reality also, which is greater.” ...  Read More

Modal Concepts in the View of Diodorus, Philo, and Chrysippus

Fereshteh Nabati

Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 109-128

Abstract
  Diodorus, Philo, and Chrysippus were the most important Megarin-stoic logicians. Modalities were one of the most interesting topics for them. In the history of logic, their views about modal concepts, definition of necessity, possibility, impossibility and the relations between these concepts are important ...  Read More

Quine and Aristotelian Essentialism

Ata Hashemi

Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 129-144

Abstract
  Quine, the famous American empiricist philosopher, in wake of his criticisms of quantified modal logic, believes that the logic is committed to a doctrine which he calls Aristotelian Essentialism, and tries to prove that the doctrine is meaningless. He defines Aristotelian Essentialism as a doctrine ...  Read More