Investigating the Methodology of  Logical Analysis: Russell's Theory of Descriptions

Shahmir, Saeedeh

doi:10.30465/lsj.2021.35951.1350

Document Type : Extension

Author

Saeedeh Shahmir

PhD student in Western Philosophy, Allameh Tabatabai University.

https://doi.org/10.30465/lsj.2021.35951.1350

Abstract

One of the goals, or perhaps the most important goal of Bertrand Russell’s prominent attempts in his philosophical and logical works was to establish a sort of Ideal or Perfect Language in order to be used to deal with the varieties of complexities, ambiguities, and paradoxes which in one way or another appear in natural languages. Such a project is built on the central notion, or better methodology, of Logical Analysis. Russell by using his logical analysis can distinguish between (genuine proper) names and definite descriptions, which further helps him to cope with three main problems: informativeness of identity claims, negative existentials, and non-existents, that is, those expressions which have no reference whatsoever. In this paper, I will introduce and explain Russell’s view in two parts: The Conceptual Aspect of his analysis, which involves the definition of logical analysis, and the Extensional Aspect, which brings in his famous Theory of Descriptions.

Keywords

References

Black, Max. and Geach, Peter. (1960). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. London: Basil Blackwell.

Davidson, Donald. (1967). “Truth and Meaning”. In Donald Davidson (2001).

_ _ _ . (2001). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Second Edition.

Frege, Gottlob. (1892). “On Sense and Reference”. In Black and Geach (1960).

Hylton, Peter. (1990). Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

_ _ _ . (2005). Propositions, Functions, and Analysis: Selected Essays on Russell's Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ludwig, Kirk. (2003). Donald Davidson. Contemporary Philosophy in Focus. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lycan, William G. (2000). Philosophy of Language: An Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.

Miller, Alexander. (2007). Philosophy of Language. London: Routledge.

Moore, M.A. (1993). Meaning and Reference. Oxford: University Press.

Nelson, R. J. (1992). Naming and Reference. London: Routledge.

Russell, Bertrand. (1905). “On Denoting”. Mind, New Series, Vol. 14, No. 56.

_ _ _ . (1919). “Descriptions”. In Moore (1993).

_ _ _ . (1990). A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. London: Bradford & Dickens.

_ _ _ . (1956). Logic and knowledge: Essays, 1901-1950. Edited by R. C. Marash. London: Allen and Unwin.

_ _ _ . (1903). Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

_ _ _ . (1913). The Collected Paper of Bertrand Russell, vii: Theory of Knowlegde: The 1913 Manuscript. Edited by Elizabeth Ramsden Eames, in collaboration with Kenneth Blackwell. London: George Allen & Unwine (1984).

Sainsbury, R. M. (1979). Russell. London: Routledge.

Logical Studies

Investigating the Methodology of Logical Analysis: Russell's Theory of Descriptions

References

References

Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
February 2021
Pages 113-133

Investigating the Methodology of Logical Analysis: Russell's Theory of Descriptions

References

References

Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2February 2021Pages 113-133

Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
February 2021
Pages 113-133