Document Type : Extension

Author

دانشکده زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

Abstract

In this paper,, I will first introduce the ontological view of Wittgenstein as it appears in the Tractatus. He starts his ontological discussion with the discussion of facts, which he then clarified by appealing to the notions of state of affairs and simple objects. I will then discuss his semantic view, which is based on his Picture Theory of Language, which brings in the notion of propositions. In such an analysis, he appeals to the notion of basic or elementary propositions and names. In his view, there is an isomorphic relationship (actually correspondence) between the logical structure of language (and its mental counterpart, thought) and the world. It is only in such a relation which a proposition can gain any meaning, or Sense. In this paper, I will investigate the relationship between the early Wittgenstein's ontological and semantic views and the way these views are related to other basic logical ideas in the Tractatus.

Keywords

 ویتگنشتاین، لودویگ. (1394). رسالة منطقی- فلسفی. ترجمه و شرح سروش دباغ. تهران: مؤسسۀ پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفۀ ایران با همکاری نشر کتاب هرمس.
_ _ _. (1379). رسالة منطقی- فلسفی (تراکتاتوس). مترجم میرشمسالدین ادیب سلطانی. تهران: انتشارات امیر کبیر.
 
Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret. (2001). An Introduction to Wittgenstein Tractatus. St. Augustine's Press.
Fogelin, Robert J. (1987). Wittgenstein. New York: Routledge.
Frascolla, Pasquale. (2006). Understanding Wittgenstein's Tractatus. New York: Routledge.
Frege, Gottlob. (1892). “On Sense and Reference”. In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, by Max Black and Peter Geach (London: Basil Blackwell, 1960), pp.56-78.
Hacker, P.M.S. (1975). “Frege and Wittgenstein on Elucidations”. Mind, Vol. 84, No. 336. Pp. 601-609.
Malcolm, Norman. (1986). Nothing is Hidden: Wittgenstein’s Criticism of his Early Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
McGinn, Marie. (2006). Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy of Language and Logic.  New York: Oxford UP.
McGinn, Marie. (1999). “Between Metaphysics and Nonsense: Elucidation in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 197, pp 491-513.
McGuinness, Brian. (2002). Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers. London: Rutledge.
Moore, A. W. (2007). “Wittgenstein and Transcendental Idealism”. In Wittgenstein and his interpreters, edited by Guy Kahane, Edward Kanterian and Oskari Kuusela, (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007), pp.174- 199.
 
Morris, Michael. (2008). Rutledge Philosophy Guidebook to Wittgenstein and theTractatus. London: Rutledge.
 
Mounce, Howard. (1990). Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (2003), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
_ _ _. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by Pears/McGuinness in Kegan Paul.
_ _ _. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Edited by Kegan Paul. London.
_ _ _. (1929). “Some Remarks on Logical Forms”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 9, pp. 162-171.