Document Type : Translation & Critic

Author

Ph.D Candidate Logic, Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

This research examines the relation between logic and ethics and tries to investigate logically the corresponding dilemmas. Standard Deontic Logic which is initially appeared for studying ethical propositions cannot offer a suitable and accurate solution for conflict between duties. Therefore some new deontic logics are made to represent this situation formally. For example Defeasible Deontic Logic and specially Reiter's Default Logic has a new approach to these moral dilemmas and offers an acceptable explanation of them.
 
 

Keywords

افلاطون (1355). جمهوری، ترجمة فؤاد روحانی، تهران: بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب.
نبوی، لطف‌الله (1389). مبانی منطق فلسفی، تهران: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
 
Brewka, Gerhard (1991). Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logical Foundations of Commonsense, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gowans, Christopher (1987). ‘The Debate on Moral Dilemmas’, in Moral Dilemmas, Christopher W. Gowans (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.
Hintikka, Jaakko (1971). ‘Some Main Problems of Deontic Logic’, in Deontic Logic, Introductory and Systematic Readings, Risto Hilpinen (ed.), New York: Humanities Press.
Horty, John (1994). ‘Moral Dilemmas and Non Monotonic Logic’, in Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 23.
Horty, John (1997). ‘Nonmonotonic Foundations for Deontic Logic’, Donald Nute (ed.), Defeasible Deontic Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ross, Sir David (1987). ‘Prima Facie Duties’, Christopher W. Gowans (ed.), Moral Dilemmas, New York: Oxford University Press.
 
منابع دیگر
McConnell, Terrance (2007). ‘Moral Dilemmas’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Retrieved 16 May 2006, http://plato.Stanford.edu/entries/moral-dilemmas/.