Candlish, Stewart (2007). The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy: palgrave-Macmillan.
Castañeda, H.-N. (1974). “Thinking and the structure of the world”: philosophia, 4(1), 3–40.
Castañeda, H.-N. (1975). “Identity and sameness. Philosophia”, 5(1-2), 121–150.
Chisholm, R. M. (1982). “Converse Intentional Properties”, The Journal of Philosophy, 79(10), 537-545.
Clark, R. (1978). “Not Every Object of Thought has Being: A Paradox in Naive Predication Theory”, Noûs, 12(2), 181.
Cocchiarella NB (2007) Formal ontology and conceptual realism. Synthese library, vol. 339. Springer, Dordrecht
Cocchiarella, N. B. (2013). “Representing Intentional Objects in Conceptual Realism”, HUMANA.MENTE Journal of Philosophical Studies, 6(25), 1-24. Retrieved from http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/132
Davidson, D. (2005). Truth and Predication. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005
Duzí, M. (2017), “If structured propositions are logical procedures then how are procedures individuated?”, Synthese 196 (2017): 1249-1283.
Eklund, M. (2019). “Regress, unity, facts, and propositions”, Synthese, 196 (4):1225-1247.
Fine, K. (1984). “Critical Review of Parsons'' "Non-Existent Objects"”: philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 45(1), 95-142.
Jacquette, D. (1997). “Reflections on mally’s heresy”, Axiomathes 8, 163–180
Jacquette, D. (1989). “Mally''s heresy and the logic of meinong''s object theory”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 10:1, 1-14,
Jespersen, B. (2019). “Anatomy of a proposition”, Synthese 196 (4):1285-1324.
King, J. (2013). “Propositional unity: What''s the problem, who has it and who solves it?”: philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 165(1), 71-93.
Landini, G. (1990). “How to Russell another Meinongian”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 37 (1):93-122.
Lewis, F. (1991). Substance and Predication in Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lowe, E. J. (2005). The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Clarendon Press.
MacBride, F. (2005). “The particular–universal distinction: A dogma of metaphysics?”, Mind 114 (455):565-614.
Matthews, G. B. 1982. “Accidental Unities”, In Language and Logos, edited by Malcolm Schofield and Martha Nussbaum, 223–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostertag, G. (2019). “Structured propositions and the logical form of predication”, Synthese 196 (4):1475-1499.
Parsons, T. (1980). Nonexistent Objects. New Haven: Yale University Press
Paśniczek, J. (1993). “The simplest Meinongian logic”, Logique Et Analyse 36:329-342.
Paśniczek, J. (1998). The Logic of Intentional Objects. A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Paśniczek, J. (1999). “On bracketing names and quantifiers in first-order logic”, History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):239-304.
Rapaport, W. (1978). “Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox”, Noûs, 12(2), 153-180.
Russell, B. (2010) [First published 1903]. Principles of Mathematics. Routledge
Sainsbury, M. (1996). “How can some thing say something?” In R. Monk, A. Palmer (Eds.), Bertrand Russell and the origins of analytic philosophy (pp. 137–153). Bristol: Thoemmes. Reprinted in Departing From Frege, Oxford: Routledge (2002).
Soames, S. (2010). What is Meaning?. Princeton University Press.
Zalta, E. N. (1983). Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics. D. Reidel.
Zalta, E. N. (1988). Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Zalta, E. N. (1992). “On Mally''s alleged heresy: A reply”, History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):59-68.
Zalta, E. N. (1997). “The modal object calculus and its interpretation”. In M. de Rijke (ed.), Advances in Intensional Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 249--279.
)