[1] Bonnay, D. (2008). Logicality and invariance. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 14(1), 29–68.
[2] Etchemendy, J. (1990). The concept of logical consequence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
[3] Field, Hartry. (2015). What is validity. In C. R .Caret, O. Hjortland (eds), Foundation of logical consequence. Oxford University Press.
[4] Field, Hartry.(2009a). “Pluralism in Logic.” Review of Symbolic Logic
[5] Frege, Gottlob.(1979). Posthumous Writings. Edited by Hans Hermes, Friederich Kambartel, and Friederich Kaulbach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[6] Gomez-Torrente, Mario. (2021). The Problem of Logical Constants and the Semantic Tradition: From Invariantist Views to a Pragmatic Account. In The Semantic conception of logic. Edited by Sagi, Gil and Woods, Jack, Cambridge
[7] Lycan, W. (1989). Logical constants and the glory of truth conditional semantics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol 30, No3, 390–400.
[8] MacFalane, J. (20221). Philosophical logic. Routledge
[9] MacFarlane, J. (2017). Is Logic a Normative Discipline? Presented in Conference on normativity of logic , university of Bergen .
[10 Peacocke, C. (1976). What is a logical constant? The Journal of Philosophy, 73(9), 221–240.
[11] Read, Stephen. (1994). Formal and material consequence. Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol 23, No 3, 247–265.
[12] Sher, G. (1991). The bounds of logic: a generalized viewpoint. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
[13] Sher, Gila. (2016). Epistemic Friction, Oxford university press
[14] Sher, Gila. (2021). Invariance and Logicality in Perspective. In The Semantic conception of logic. Edited by Sagi, Gil and Woods, Jack, Cambridge
[15] Tarski,Alfred (1983a). “On the Concept of Logical Consequence.” In: Logic, Semantics, Metamatethematics. Ed. by John Corcoran. Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 409–420.
[6] Zinke, Alexandra. (2021). Reinterpreting logic, In The Semantic conception of logic. Edited by Sagi, Gil and Woods, Jack, Cambridge
