نوع مقاله : ترجمه و نقد
نویسنده
کارشناس ارشد فلسفة دین، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
In 1970, Gödel showed his ontological argument to Dana Scott and discussed it with him. Afterwards, Scott presented a slightly different version of the argument at Princeton University. The logical system of the argument is a second-order quantified S5-modal logic with identity and an abstraction operator. Granted the acceptability of the underlying logical system, Gödel’s conclusion that necessarily there exists a God-like being ) ) can be derived from the premises-with Gödel and Scott on the scene, who can say otherwise? Sobel, however, proved that the system faces modal collapse-i.e. P↔□P is derivable from the system. Responding to Sobel, Anderson tried to block this by weakening some axioms and definitions.
In this paper, I will be trying to consider Gödel’s ontological argument (Scott’s version) from a logical point of view, along with Sobel’s criticism and Anderson’s emendations.
کلیدواژهها English
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,756 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,875 |
