Volume 15 (2024)
Volume 14 (2023)
Volume 13 (2022)
Volume 12 (2021)
Volume 11 (2020)
Volume 10 (2019)
Volume 9 (2018)
Volume 8 (2017)
Volume 7 (2016)
Volume 6 (2015)
Volume 5 (2014)
Volume 4 (2013)
Volume 3 (2012)
Volume 2 (2011)
Volume 1 (2010)
Number of Articles: 6
A Critique of the Paper "the Paradox of Informing from Absolute Unknown: Analyzing the Concept of ‘Information" ‘.
Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 1-43
Abstract
The main purpose of this essay is to review and criticize the paper published earlier in this journal, Logical Study, titled ‘the Paradox of the informing from Absolute Unknown: Analyzing the Concept of information’ written by Sharifzadeh and Hodjati. In spite of having some useful points, ... Read MoreNormativity of Meaning
Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 44-64
Abstract
Many philosophers claim that semantic content of language is normative, which means that meaning of a term prescribes the pattern of use or determines which pattern of use can be described as ‘correct’. The most important arguments for normativity, made by Kripke, Boghossian and others, are ... Read MoreThe Pseudo-Conceptuality of Inherently Impossible Affairs
Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 65-88
Abstract
Even though, in Aristotelian and Islamic logic and philosophy, inherently impossible affairs don’t actualize in the world and can’t be actualized, they are considered meaningful, and thus their characteristics and their philosophical judgments have been discussed by Islamic philosophers. ... Read MoreAnselm’s Ontological Argument and the Self-Comparison Problem
Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 89-108
Abstract
Anselm’s ontological argument is the most famous one which has been controversial since its appearance. One crucial part of the argument is “if [that than which nothing greater cannot be conceived] exists solely in the mind even, it can be thought to exist in reality also, which is greater.” ... Read MoreModal Concepts in the View of Diodorus, Philo, and Chrysippus
Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 109-128
Abstract
Diodorus, Philo, and Chrysippus were the most important Megarin-stoic logicians. Modalities were one of the most interesting topics for them. In the history of logic, their views about modal concepts, definition of necessity, possibility, impossibility and the relations between these concepts are important ... Read MoreQuine and Aristotelian Essentialism
Volume 4, Issue 1 , March 2013, Pages 129-144